Families' Distress Over Coastal Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Clarity
An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”
The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.